|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/30/68 11:36
In article
<1136475217.625388.118620@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Joey" <Lost.Joey@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Please don't laugh, but I am using my photo editor (Ulead Photoimpact
> 11) to create my website. I simply do not have the time needed to
> learn html and frontpage and I have been using Photoimpact for years
> and this one is pretty good - in that I can create rollover objects
> and banners, menus etc with great ease. So I am almost content with
> it, except for the length of time it takes to load the page on screen.
>
> A colleague who knows HTML had a look at it and said that the source
> code is 5 pages long whereas most sites are about 2, and he says this
> is why browsers load the page so slowly.
>
> Is there anyway I can reduce this? I have compared my home page source
> code with that of a similar site and one of the main differences is
> that mine is filled with entries like this:
>
> </SCRIPT></HEAD><BODY TOPMARGIN=0 LEFTMARGIN=0 MARGINWIDTH=0
> MARGINHEIGHT=0><TABLE BORDER=0 C
I suspect it is slow because there are too many pictures rather
than too much html (which it would have too much of, true). Your
method is very unwise. At the very least use software that sort
of specialises in producing html, dreamweaver and so on, google
up. Photo editing software has some of these functions to do
image maps, rollovers and so on but I suspect you are essentially
doing everything in pictures and it is fighting to display
them... Don't do it.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|