|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 01/07/06 23:00
With neither quill nor qualm, Luigi Donatello Asero quothed:
> > But doesn't it get your goat that she probably killfiled you first?
>
> She may put me in her killfile all the times she wants.
Once could be enough.
> > Anyway, I never killfile anyone, not radicals, not smart-assed broads,
> > not teenage(-ish) wisecracking jerks, -not anyone. I may not read their
> > crap and probably wouldn't reply to any drivel they spew, but why give
> > them the satisfaction of knowing they are important enough in your life
> > for you to take special action over?
>
> You are free to put them or not in your killfile.
> It is up to you
Of course. But why bother unless there are _so_ many people out there
you want to killfile that it becomes a nuisance to skip them? (And in
that case the problem would probably be mostly you.)
> > Another thing is, and more important, that people are people and no one
> > has a good day everyday. However, personalities do come out in
> > newsgroups and you do have the choice of how to respond on both a
> > general and individual basis.
>
> I know that. That is why some people who have got a warning are not in the
> killfile yet...
I might suggest that warnings like that could be counter-productive.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|