|
|
Posted by Malte Christensen on 01/08/06 16:27
Bernhard Sturm wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
>
> this is a perfect example to demonstrate that valid HTML (the page we
> are discussing here validates as 'valid HTML 4.01'!) does not mean that
> the page is semantically valid. The source code above is not structured
> and semantically questionable if not completely wrong. I doubt whether
> the author of such a source has understood the concept of separating
> layout from structure, and hence renders the discussion 'table-layout
> vs. CSS-tableless layout' useless.
As I said initially, I wasn't out to start a war ;-)
I read all of the responses, went to all the sites, and made up my mind
to use CSS.
The interim results after 3 hours are at www.nmalte.dk. I am very
pleased with the clarity that this design results in, even if probably
everything could be improved. That I am not exactly a graphics designer
is also clear... But heck, writing Java code is more fun anyway :-)
Constructive criticism always welcome. My mail address is on the site.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|