|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 01/09/06 15:36
Neredbojias wrote:
> With neither quill nor qualm, Jonathan N. Little quothed:
>
>
>>Neredbojias wrote:
>>
>>
>>>With neither quill nor qualm, Kevin Scholl quothed:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>You mean for you as a User? Not that I know. As far as I remember,
>>>>>there are no serious security issues using the flash plugin (so it's
>>>>>much better than having active-X, Java or JavaScript enabled).
>>>>
>>>>Erm, just as an aside, Javascript does not have inherent security issues
>>>>in and of itself. It's actually remarkably safe. It's when JS is used to
>>>>access active-x controls that the problems typically arise.
>>>
>>>
>>>Hear! Hear! Give that man a cigar!
>>>
>>>(Guess you can tell I agree.)
>>>
>>
>>Yes, Javascript, not MS's JScript which can access COM on Windows OS
>
>
> Another MS security issue? Hard to believe...
>
Naw...security is Mr Bill's middle name!
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|