|
|
Posted by cwdjrxyz on 11/22/49 11:37
David Dorward wrote:
> cwdjrxyz wrote:
>
> > "Bad example" is a value judgement taken alone, and is meaningless in a
> > technical example without technical specifics. Your follow up technical
> > specific concerns the mime2.php file. It is doing exactly what I want
> > it to do - namely serve application/xhtml+xml to any browser that
> > claims it will accept it at all.
>
> Incorrect. It serves application/xhtml+xml to any browser that mentions that
> mime type in its accept header - even if the mentioning is to explicitly
> state that it does not accept it (i.e. with a quality value of zero).
>
> > Some claim they would rather have html, but I want to bypass that when at
> > all possible.
>
> What a great idea. Assume that you know what a browser supports better then
> the browser itself. That's never going to cause a problem! </sarcasm>
I answered about the same as the above in a response to Michael Winter.
To avoid extensive duplication, I will not repeat it here.
> > such as the CSS background-color bug for Mozilla family browsers mentioned
> > in a comment in my posted code.
>
> What background colour bug? I seem to recall some discussion on backgrounds
> a while back, which came to the conclusion that XHTML was not HTML and thus
> certain special cases which apply to HTML don't apply to XHTML - but I
> don't remember the specifics right now.
The above also is covered in my long response to Michael Winter
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|