|
|
Posted by cwdjrxyz on 01/21/42 11:37
Alan J. Flavell wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, David Dorward wrote:
>
> > cwdjrxyz wrote:
> >
> > > It is doing exactly what I want
> > > it to do - namely serve application/xhtml+xml to any browser that
> > > claims it will accept it at all.
> >
> > Incorrect. It serves application/xhtml+xml to any browser that mentions that
> > mime type in its accept header - even if the mentioning is to explicitly
> > state that it does not accept it (i.e. with a quality value of zero).
>
> Blimey, *that* old chestnut again. Why *do* people insist on
> reinventing the wheel, and then making it square? (or in this case
> maybe triangular).
I covered about the same as the above in a long response to Michael
Winter. Thus I will not repeat it here.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|