|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/20/06 04:21
In article <5oXzf.1875$SB2.1074@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"Jim" <reply@groups.please> wrote:
> > But you perhaps have more practical aims... good luck!
>
> After looking at the options, it is simpler for me if I use frames to
> accomplish my goals. I will have to force pages to stay within those frames
> (even those with scripts designed to defeat being framed) - but I think the
> trade-off is worth the fuss that the webmasters will make.
>
> It may be a total bust.....who knows? If the surfing public does not like
> it, or if it becomes a tool for abuse of websites, I will withdraw it.
>
> The webmasters that may not like it will simply have to learn to grin and
> bear it. The entire web (unless you have a passworded site) is for the
> surfers. And, if the people elect to surf using my tools to make the web a
> more lively and interactive place - so be it.
>
> I can assure you that I do not want negative press or hard feelings, that I
> take my responsibilities as a programmer quite seriously and would do
> nothing to tarnish the name of my family or my company.
>
> Although there will be objections (and bugs to be worked out for sure), I
> will do my best to balance the needs of the surfer with the needs and rights
> of the content owners.
>
> No matter what you do, if you do anything at all, somebody will criticize,
> condem or complain. As will be the case with my tools.
>
> I say....webmasters be silent.....let the surfers speak. I will listen to
> them, for they are what makes the web work.
>
> Jim
Yes, good for you. Keep us all informed.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|