|
|
Posted by John Salerno on 01/23/06 05:46
cwdjrxyz wrote:
> So far as I know you are not using true XHTML unless you serve as
> application/xhtml+xml, even for the most loose form which is XHTML 1.0
> transitional.
Hmm, is there more to XHTML than just the small syntactic changes then?
The only differences I've read about so far are things like lowercase
tags, closing empty elements, etc. Is there anything wrong with writing
a website this way and calling it "XHTML"?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|