|
|
Posted by John Salerno on 02/02/06 22:51
Spartanicus wrote:
> John Salerno <johnjsal@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is there a website that lists all XHTML tags and their descriptions,
>>from W3C? I see the spec. document, but it doesn't get into the
>> specifics of each tag.
>
> XHTML 1.x is merely a reformulation of HTML4 into XML, so the XHTML 1.x
> specs do not define the elements. Use the HTML 4.01 spec. for element
> definitions, or better: use the real thing itself instead of playing
> silly games with backslashes:
> http://www.spartanicus.utvinternet.ie/no-xhtml.htm
>
>> Is there anything like this for CSS as well?
>
> CSS doesn't have tags or elements:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
>
Aside from " />", is there any difference between HTML 4.01 and XHTML 1.0?
But I guess one reason I've gone with XHTML is that it will eventually
replace HTML. It won't be an alternate version, and it doesn't seem
likely that there will be an HTML 5. I've never seen a problem with the
/> tag yet, so just like there's no real reason to use XHTML, there
doesn't seem to be much of a reason *not* to.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|