|
Posted by David Segall on 02/04/06 17:10
Andy Dingley <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
[Convincing pro XHTML argument snipped]
>Meanwhile the rest of the world sees MS Office and Dreamweaver as
>appropriate HTML authoring tools, despite their absolutely glaring
>holes.
What is wrong with Dreamweaver 8 in the context of your argument?
Pages that I write using it validate using both the built-in validator
and the one at http://validator.w3.org/.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|