|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 02/06/06 18:51
Mel wrote:
> I guess you cant see the forest for the trees !
> I never claimed anywhere that my components are perfect and pass any
> validation that Jonathan could come up with now. did i ?
Please learn how to quote.
If your toolkit is supposed to generate HTML markup then it should
produce valid code. If not, it is not a good toolkit.
>
> Obviously The components that your would write will pass all those
> tests. ITS the idea that counts. How things should be.
>
> Let me ak another questions. Why don't you write ASSEMBLY CODE instead
> of perl or C++ or Java ?
Not sure what your driving at, but if your tool kit is supposed to
generate C++ code, (oh I don't know been way too long say like OWL for
Borland C++ to generate Windows UI), but generated invalid code, what
good would it be?
>
> I consider HTML as assembly language of internet. If you can get your
> calendar in one line of code like:
>
> tk::calendar -variable myvar
Fine if the markup is valid, if not does not display correctly in the
browser, again what good is it?
> would you still sit down and write 800 lines of javascript ?
>
> think about it, please before jumping into conclusions.
Not conclusions, observations...Have you looked at the markup your
toolkit generates? Not just deprecated markup, but some markup that is
just plain incorrect.
> You are not forced to use anything you dont like, but someday soon we
> all have to.
>
> regargds;
> Mel
>
Lastly, with Usenet protocol, a signature is denoted with 2 hyphens, as
space and a carriage return.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|