|
|
Posted by dorayme on 02/11/06 19:39
In article <dsi4u0$g5a$1@phys-news4.kolumbus.fi>,
"Wrm" <nomailstodragon@north.invalid> wrote:
> "Smiley" <none@ofyourbusiness.com> kirjoitti
> viestiss:J9-dnaVD6YUTHnHenZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@golden.net...
>
> <snip>
>
> > Okay, I wanted to put a background image in the top left cell that had a
> > height of 160.
>
> If it's ALL that you want image in top left but nothing under it, why don't
> you do something like this...
> http://www.kolumbus.fi/ace/ng/image-in-top-left.html ? Just set image in
> body background and use padding on left, that is.
Why do you include
html,body
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
Makes no difference in any of my browsers whether this is in or
left out.
Under what circumstances does it become important to give specs
for html? What a queer concept, assigning margins to the html! I
obviously have not got my head around this seeming abstraction?
(Just btw, left-margin is better at 180 as the 10px you allow
still jams the text up to the pic, I mention in case there is an
informative browser issue here...)
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|