|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 02/11/06 22:46
With neither quill nor qualm, Richard Sexton quothed:
> There's a trade off. At the end of the day if it looks the same on
> a PDA as on a huge monitor, where "looks the same" does not mean identical
> but close enough, that is, if if looks very similar at any resolution
> wthout things banging all about or screwing up, then I'm happy.
>
> If I can read it and it doesn't look stupid that's the goal, wide
> screen or small screen.
You make the same mistake as (some of) the w3c. It shouldn't look the
same at all. Arguably, it should be renderable on both devices, but a
good case can be made against even that.
OTOH, a primarily text-information site probably should function well in
anything and have aural and accessibility provisions under a number of
circumstances.
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|