|
|
Posted by Richard Sexton on 02/12/06 16:44
In article <MPG.1e57fb0bc0251e3b9897c6@news.isp.com>,
Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
>With neither quill nor qualm, Richard Sexton quothed:
>
>> There's a trade off. At the end of the day if it looks the same on
>> a PDA as on a huge monitor, where "looks the same" does not mean identical
>> but close enough, that is, if if looks very similar at any resolution
>> wthout things banging all about or screwing up, then I'm happy.
>>
>> If I can read it and it doesn't look stupid that's the goal, wide
>> screen or small screen.
>
>You make the same mistake as (some of) the w3c. It shouldn't look the
>same at all. Arguably, it should be renderable on both devices, but a
>good case can be made against even that.
>
>OTOH, a primarily text-information site probably should function well in
>anything and have aural and accessibility provisions under a number of
>circumstances.
The purpose is to convey the information. Anything else is superfluous.
--
Need Mercedes parts ? - http://parts.mbz.org
Richard Sexton | Mercedes stuff: http://mbz.org
1970 280SE, 72 280SE | Home page: http://rs79.vrx.net
633CSi 250SE/C 300SD | http://aquaria.net http://killi.net
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|