|
|
Posted by dorayme on 02/13/06 02:15
In article <Xns9768F011216BFjkorpelacstutfi@193.229.4.246>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> "Greg N." <yodel_dodel@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> I don't think that's any of your real examples.
> >
> > What are you trying to imply here?
>
> That you did not present your real problem.
>
> > You tell me. You're the smart one around here.
>
> I find it mildly disguisting that you make nasty notes about a named
> person and hide yourself under an incomplete name.
>
This is silly indeed. In general, if you had learnt from my
previous advice to you, you would see that there are far more
serious types of "personal " deceptions than the use of nom de
plumes on email addresses for newsgroups. But in particular, this
is quite outlandishly bad, this GregN, for God's sake has
published pictures of himself on motorbikes. There's not much
that is incomplete about this. How about a picture of you on a
motorbike for us to see? Or a camel?
> > again, you seem to imply I'm trying something unethical here, maybe
> > keyword spamming?
>
> I am implying that you did not present your real problem, and you seem
> to prove it by not explaining it, by not giving any URL or other real
> examples that would illustrate it, and by trying to insult.
>
> > If I were as competent as you think you are, I'd
> > only imply that after spotting some evidence.
>
> Is this your usual way of talking to people who are capable of helping
> and were even willing to do that for free?
Once again, you have obviously not learnt from my previous
lessons to you about this sentiment. In case I never put it this
way, getting advice from you is rarely free, it so often comes at
the price of humiliation.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|