|
|
Posted by Erland Sommarskog on 10/01/68 11:27
(mittal.pradeep@gmail.com) writes:
> Thanks a lot for the reply.
> 1. I am not able to understand why i require a 10 way join though. If i
> have a mapping between custom column and actual column, all i need is a
> dyanamic sql generated from the mapping.
>
> E.g.
> table
> -----
> pk, custom1, custom2, custom3...custom10
>
>
> map
> ---
> customColName ActualColName
> custom1 ActualName1
> custom2 ActualName2
> ....
>
> Now I can generate dynamic sql using map.
When I said 10-way join I was thinking of the vertical solution. For the
horisontal solution it's a simple join - once you have gone through all
that SQL building. To me, this sounds more complex to implement. Then
again, if the user selects dynamically which columns he wants to see,
the horizontal solution would require dynamic SQL as well.
> 2. As long as number of custom columns is enough to take care data
> element additions which happen in a year. All that is needed is
> addition of new elements to mapping table to decifer newly assigned
> custom columns
I didn't realise that you had this mapping table. One could say that
this is a kind of compromise between the horizonal model and an entirely
static vertical model.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se
Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techinfo/productdoc/2000/books.asp
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|