|
|
Posted by John Bell on 09/25/05 09:53
Hi Scott
Non taken!
You can't always give good advice, sometimes the best you can do is throw
ideas into the pot.
Using a scheduled job may be less of an preblem when considering
invalidating the contract! Although running it once a minute may cause
issues such as blocking.
I have assumed that the information you are entering is not available on
this system, therefore it is not possible to pick it up at report time from
other fields.
John
"Scott Marquardt" <wasREMOVEket5@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1127610853.841b341db0737c3d0f8b5850b289ecae@teranews...
> Scott Marquardt opined thusly on Sep 24:
>> John Bell opined thusly on Sep 24:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> If you are not writing a new interface then you are probably better
>>> using a
>>> fixed notation. Such as InvoiceNumber/VendorAcronym/Status. If each part
>>> is
>>> a fixed length then you don't need a separator, but it may help the
>>> users
>>> differentiate the different parts. I would have expect that you can
>>> determine the fact that an invoice is a referral by a different means.
>>
>> Well, we could get into "I would have expected" exchanges, or we can skip
>> the stuff I already know -- and posted in the original post. With all due
>> respect, "duh."
>>
>> Good grief. Outta here.
>
> John., I'm going to apologize for a short temper there. It was born of
> impatience.
>
> My principal interest was in hearing how anyone else might PARSE the field
> to recover the data. Erland's trigger idea isn't bad for WHAT I do with
> it.
>
> "Invoice for 1/2 inch puce widgets and a can of beans,
> 100-3123@WidgetMart"
>
> "Refund for can of beans, 100-3123&WidgetMart"
>
> The second one would need to be tagged as a referral to the first one. But
> if that's my basic technique, they're parse out the same way.
>
> --
>
> Scott
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|