Posted by Le on 10/10/05 16:46

Our HP representatives are telling us that backing/restoring our MS SQL
Servers with "HP Data Protector (HPDP)" is better and safer than using
MS Sql's backup/restore process.

I have strong hesitations, because MS Sql's processes gives us a great
deal of flexability.

Has anyone have any experience wsith "HP Data Protector (HPDP)"?

• Next in forum: Template function
• Prev in forum: LIKE and IN can I combine
• Thread view: Sql Server backup vs HP Data Protector (HPDP) -- Do *not* use SQL Server?

[Reply to this message]