Posted by gilles27 on 10/25/05 18:24

Our review of the primary keys was triggered by one of our customers
complaining about the performance of the database. They claimed to have
"re-sequenced the primary key which reduced Index reads by a factor of
5". Do you have any idea as to how they arrived at this conclusion?

• Next in forum: Re: Problem with simple cursor
• Prev in forum: Identical database w/ identical stored procedures?
• Thread view: Re: Sequence of columns in primary key

[Reply to this message]