Posted by M. Sokolewicz on 01/13/05 16:59

Justin French wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Pretty sure this can't be done, but thought I'd ask any way...
>
> I have a function where the 3rd argument is an array..
>
> function foo($a,$b,$c) {
> echo $a.$b;
> print_r($c);
> }
>
> Obviously the function does more than that, but anyway, I want the calls
> to this function to look a little cleaner than this:
>
> foo("cat","dog",array("a"=>"1","b"=>"2","c"=>"3"));
>
> is there any other way to define the array?
>
> foo("cat","dog",("a"=>"1","b"=>"2","c"=>"3")); or
> foo("cat","dog",{"a"=>"1","b"=>"2","c"=>"3"}); would be nice (Ruby has
> something like this), but I'm guessing it's not possible.
nope, that's the only way
>
> But, I'm asking just in case I've missed it in the docs.
>
> TIA
>
> ---
> Justin French, Indent.com.au
> justin.french@indent.com.au
> Web Application Development & Graphic Design

• Next in thread: Re: quicker arrays as func args?
• Prev in thread: quicker arrays as func args?
• Next in forum: Re: How to compile a script into executable file
• Prev in forum: Re: How to compile a script into executable file
• Thread view: quicker arrays as func args?

[Reply to this message]