Posted by Peter Yu on 11/07/05 11:29

It works fine. But I don't understand why you said *the
US99000D is not match against the instance in the derived table* ?

*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

• Next in forum: Re: update spends 1800 times more than select
• Prev in forum: Re: update spends 1800 times more than select
• Thread view: Re: update spends 1800 times more than select

[Reply to this message]