Posted by wackyphill on 10/23/41 11:35

Yeah, I see in 2000 you'd do an insert into a temp table to assign a #
to each row. In 2005 this is not necessary, so would there be any
reason speed wise to use a temp table?

• Next in forum: Re: intead of update/insert trigger on view question
• Prev in forum: Re: Temp Table Faster?
• Thread view: Re: Temp Table Faster?

[Reply to this message]