|
|
Posted by John Bell on 02/05/06 15:44
Hi
You don't really have enough to play with to make a system that I would go
for. Separating data files from log files and the OS would require another
set of Raid 1 discs. To make your system more resilient the data files would
require another disc on top of that to give Raid 5 although Raid 10 would be
preferable.
You may want to read:
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/rc_hardware_planning.asp
With what you have I would stick data/log files onto the disc 3/4 pair, then
look for more budget.
John
"Hank Rouse" <hank_top_sf@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BA9Ff.41737$dW3.17682@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
> Question, I have a dedicated SQL Server box, just the OS and SQL Server,
> and
> was curious as to where best to setup DB.
>
> Drive Size What
> Drive1 73GB OS & SQL Server Software
> Drive2 73GB mirror of Drive 2
> Drive3 300GB Actual DBs
> Drive4 300GB mirror of Drive 3
>
> In doing so, my reasoning would be to leave the OS alone. Will be running
> either Windows 2003 server, or 2000 Advanced Server, not sure yet.
>
> Presently have about 4M records archived in different Access DBs, and I
> know
> size will grow to about 33M within 1 year.
>
> TIA,
> Hank
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|