|
Posted by Bobus on 02/15/06 03:20
Thanks for the responses everyone!
MGFoster: I was asking about the "limit" clause so that I could
implement a solution similar to what Erland recommended. This
guarantees no collisions.
Randy: in your solution, I believe there is a chance that two
concurrent requests will end up grabbing the same pin.
Alexander: clever! It's like an Oracle sequence. But, in our
particular case, we could have a problem of unused pins for
transactions which rollback.
Hugo: that should definintely do the trick.
Erland: yours too! I will try them both out.
Thanks for the help!
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|