|
|
Posted by John Dunlop on 09/09/05 13:46
Juul wrote:
> You may use xxx@xxx.com (xxx) as the From header, that shouldn't be a problem.
Because it gives the impression of working? Sorry, ain't gonna wash
in a technical forum.
I think Ken was right to be suspicious, because afaics
From: foo@bar.invalid (foo)
is not allowed to be generated under RFC2822.
It is one of the two forms allowed by son-of-RFC1036 though, so you
might find it on Usenet, and that might be where your idea that it
'shouldn't be a problem' comes from.
> The real problem I found was the use of \r\n. I tried to use \n only and it
> works fine!
What you tried there, what the Manual calls 'a last resort', suggests
the real problem lies with your MTA.
--
Jock
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|