|
|
Posted by Oli Filth on 11/11/56 11:30
Jerry Stuckle said the following on 28/10/2005 16:46:
> Oli Filth wrote:
>
>> Jerry Stuckle said the following on 28/10/2005 04:28:
>>
>>>
>>> No, my original point was related to the original part of this
>>> thread. You're trying to change that.
>>
>>
>> At the risk of flogging a dead horse...
>> If your post was in response to the original part of the thread, then
>> you should've posted it as a reply there. If you post it as a reply to
>> an unrelated branch (i.e. one that digressed, like NG discussions tend
>> to do), you can hardly be surprised when someone says "What the hell?
>> How does that relate to what I just said?".
>>
>
> You should read back through this branch.
OK... let's see:
Me:
> The biggest single reason I love an IDE that "understands" the
> language? Project navigation. A project with 100 classes split over
> an equally large number of source/header files, in a generic text
> editor, if I wanted to look up the the *!!!IMPLEMENTATION!!!* of
> X::Foo(), I'd either have to remember that Class X is defined
> somewhere in source file Y, then search that file (semi)manually, or
> do a global search for "Foo()" and wade through the results. In an
> IDE, I click on X in class-view, then click on Foo(), and I'm
> straight there.
You:
> Or, you just look it up in the project documentation.
Me:
> Notice that I was referring to jumping to *implementation*, not
> *doucmentation*
You:
> But Documentation should be completed BEFORE Implementation!
Me:
> What bearing does that have on anything?
Maybe it's just me, but your responses are complete non-sequiturs!
And AFAIK, in a NG when you reply to *and* quote someone, it's the norm
to post something that follows on in some way!
--
Oli
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|