|
|
Posted by Mary-Anne Nayler on 05/10/05 02:24
Nested tables are the absolute worst thing you can do! A screen reader
is able to tab to a table and tab within a table but once you begin to
have tables within tables, UGH! To quote accessibility guru Joe Clark;
"With nested tables, a screen reader user ends up working from within a
maze formed by one table within another". All you coders out there know
how hard it is to code nested tables and how confusing it gets right?
Imagine trying to reverse engineer this jumbled mess with nothing but
audio to go on!
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote, On 10/05/05 01:59 AM:
>* Mikey <frak@totalise.co.uk>:
>
>
>>I have just come back from the client visit and one of the issues that
>>arose was over the use of accessible markup, more specifically the use
>>of tables versus the use of layers.
>>
>>Now, my long held belief was that div/layers were added to the spec so
>>that designers could separate presentation markup from content - that
>>is, use positioned layers for laying out content, use tables for
>>tables of data as they were originally intended. However, my client
>>seemed adamant that it was the other way around and that the use of
>>tables was preferred owing to browser compatibility issues.
>>
>>Now, I have just had a look around w3 and have found some inferences
>>that support my view but nothing that states clearly in either
>>direction. Does anyone on this list have a definitive answer for this
>>one?
>>
>>
>
>You have it correct, theoretically, regarding accessibility. Tables
>should be used for tabular data, divs for presentation and layout.
>
>However, many people confuse accessibility with consistency; they want a
>look-and-feel that works the same no matter what the browser. (Why they
>feel this is accessibility is anybody's guess, but I've seen it a number
>of times). In this latter arena, on a practical level, tables are
>typically your best bet.
>
>I've done a lot of tableless and table-based layouts, and the
>unfortunate fact of the matter is it's a lot easier to create a layout
>that is consistent cross-browser and cross-platform using tables. Until
>IE supports the CSS2 'display: table-*' elements (which is the easiest
>way of creating columns of the same height), this will continue to be
>the case.
>
>Now, this does not mean you should create a bunch of nested tables for
>the layout. I find that a simple skeleton made of a table with a few
>columns can create the basic page layout, and then I use as much CSS as
>I can within (unordered lists for navigation menus, floats to position
>image/caption pairs, etc.). This combines some of the best of both
>worlds, and creates a fairly accessible page at the same time.
>
>As in all things, it's a matter of balance.
>
>
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|