|
Posted by Tony Marston on 10/15/20 11:36
"Anonymous" <anonymous@nowhere.invalid> wrote in message
news:43AE8ECF.54D24C7C@nowhere.invalid...
> Tony Marston wrote:
>>
>> Case-sensitivity is the whole point of this thread. Any language that has
>> a
>> feature which can be abused and which produces unmaintainable code is a
>> BAD
>> language. Any language that allows the same variable or function name to
>
> Then any language is bad by your definition.
Any language that allows stupid mistakes is a bad language. That's why some
programmers say that statically-typed and compiled languages are better that
dynamically-typed interpretted languages.
> That's not true. Anyone proficient in german can assure you that "Helft
> den armen Vφgeln." and "Helft den Armen vφgeln." means something
> *completely* different! ;-)
Trust the bloody square-head sausage-eaters to throw a spanner in the works.
But in ENGLISH, which is the universal language, there is no difference.
Just check out any dictionary. Does it have separate entries in each case?
No? I wonder why.....
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|