|
Posted by d on 09/27/63 11:37
"gooze" <g000ze@gmx.net> wrote in message
news:1137281732.396516.133370@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Thank you for your answer. Actually I store the pictures in the DB
> because they belong to the records fields. In this case it would be
> meaningless to store the pictures on the filesystem, since there are
> thousands of them and they are very small.
>
> Just wondering if there is a way with only one query.
Just keep the filenames with the records to which they belong. As to
storing thousands of small files, that's exactly what a filesystem is for
and exactly what a database is not for :)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|