|
|
Posted by ~=_Slawek_=~ on 02/17/06 21:37
Hello Michael.
Thanks for thinking over my problem. Your 4. assumption is right i cant tell
all other are wrong but I think they are. For my code:
mysql_query("UPDATE liczniki SET value=value+1 WHERE
owner_id='".$this->get_user_id()."' AND
owner_licznik_number='$owner_licznik_number'");
It takes 80ms to a couple of seconds, on shared hosting with DB overloaded
by other users (I assume some kind of write behind caching is responsible
for that). Table size is for now 100 records.
For table structure:
FIELD::TYPE::NULL::KEY::DEFAULT
id::int(10) unsigned::::PRI::NULL::auto_increment
owner_id::int(10) unsigned::YES::MUL::NULL::
owner_user::varchar(255)::YES::MUL::NULL::
owner_licznik_number::int(11) unsigned::::MUL::0::
value::int(10) unsigned::::::0::
type::enum('inny','online','wyswietlen','odwiedzin')::::::inny::
sub_type::enum('tekstowy','graficzny')::::::tekstowy::
style::blob::YES::::NULL::
settings::blob::YES::::NULL::
last_updated::timestamp::YES::::0000-00-00 00
TIA.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|