|
|
Posted by steve on 10/23/05 23:18
"rush" <pipa@rush.avalon.hr> wrote in message
news:djdjm0$7pt$1@ss405.t-com.hr...
| "steve" <a@bc.com> wrote in message news:8Gb6f.8344$fm7.3832@fe06.lga...
| > "anger" and "good will" are completely relative terms and have *no*
| > relevance to the superiority of *any* technology. usually, i write my
best
| > viruses when i'm good and pissed-off! my "good will" is to see how many
| pc's
| > i can crater! and further, i choose how i will write them and what
| language
| > i'll use *based* on the "superiorities" of delivery methods (technology)
| > available and what i actually want to do with said virus.
|
| you are having a bad day or what?
no...as a programmer, i like logic. the statement you made embraced about
five of the most commonly practiced logical fallacies. perhaps that prompted
my response. anyway, the statement and the point(s) that were attempted to
be made were simply invalid.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|