|
|
Posted by Erland Sommarskog on 02/26/06 19:53
quinto (fiorelli.m@gmail.com) writes:
> Can someone shed some light on the advantages of using Enterprise vs
> Standard strictly from a language support perspective?
I can't think of any.
> Also, is there any caveats or other considerations that I should keep
> in mind to make sure that the developers have all they need to develop
> these multi language sites?
First of all, you need to decide on how to store the multi-lingual
data. In clear text this means you need to settle on how to store
the Japanese data. I would settle for Unicode and use nvarchar columns,
but I believe Shift-JIS is still in widely use, and this if you charset
varchar is your choice.
To get a multi-lingual application right, you need to make a basic
design right from the start, because later on, it can be very difficult
to change. And very expensive.
In our application, about all tables that define entities have a
"name table" which holds the names of the entities in various languages.
So for, say, instrumenttypes with ityid as the primary key, there is
also a table instrumenttypenames with ityid and languageid as PK. I
should that this far we support only the Nordic languages togther with
German and English.
But that is only part of the problem. One thing we have entirely
negclected is the collation, which controls sorting and comparison.
If users are to perform searches, you may have to have different
collations for the various languages. This is another issue you need
to research early.
--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se
Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|