|
|
Posted by Michael Trausch on 06/15/34 11:41
Hello everyone,
I'm having a little bit of trouble trying to implement some arithmetic
logic into an application that I'm working on, and I'm hoping that
somebody can possibly point me in the right direction. I am working
with a database with ZIP codes, latitudes, and longitudes, and am
working to implement the Haversine formula alongside with another
formula for creating a "box" that I can use to get locations from within
a square (or as close as you can get with the Earth, anyway).
While I was reading up on the math and working through the problem, I
wrote a function (well, two) in the bc calculator language to process
this information manually while initially working with the concepts.
Now that I have a semi-functional understanding of the problem, I
rewrote the logic in PHP, and am having a problem actually computing
longitude portions of coordinates for the "box" that I want to use to
pull data about a given region.
The problem as best as I can tell resides in the latlong_box($lat,
$long, $miles) function that I've written in PHP, but I'm not seeing
anything different, computationally, from what I've implemented in bc;
of course, I could just be suffering from staring at it too long, too.
:-) I'm not sure if I am expecting something that PHP won't provide, or
if I'm handling something not quite right in PHP's arithmetic eyes, or
what, really. The latitudes being computed are correct, it's just the
longitudes that are way off.
I will go ahead and give a link to the code and include a sample run of
the script. I appreciate any help/pointers!
Thanks in advance,
Mike
The source:
http://www.staffasap.com/zip_test.phps
The sample run:
> ./zip_test.php
Array
(
[zipcode] => 30034
[latitude] => +33.6907570
[longitude] => -084.2511710
[city] => DECATUR
[state] => GEORGIA
[abbr] => GA
)
Query SELECT * FROM dataZipCode WHERE latitude <= 33.980220566111 AND
latitude >= 33.401293433889 AND longitude <= -122.70422048692 AND
longitude >= -122.70422048692
Returned 0 rows
>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|