|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 03/08/06 07:17
geniolatenio wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 14:30:24 GMT, "Beauregard T. Shagnasty"
> <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> wrote:
>
>>geniolatenio wrote:
>>
>>> So this left padding problem with IE, in the end, IS too complicated
>>> even for you guys.. damn.. I'm fuxxed!
>>
>> I don't see a problem. No, it is not too complicated.
>
> that's the "fixed" version, the one with the workaround.. here, i've
> uploaded the "not working" version here..
> http://incarta.altervista.org/indexok.html
This link looks the same to me, in Firefox and IE6.
> but at this point I suppose it really is an IE problem..no one can
> solve it
That old browser has lots of problems, eh?
>> ..though I would not do the layout as you are. I would use em instead
>> of px for just about every measurement in your style sheet. And I
>> would drop Verdana; google for the reasons. I would also set the
>> font size to 100%.
>
> mmm.. may I ask you why not the px?
IE users with vision problems will not be able to resize it, so they can
read it, when px (or pt) is used. If you use percentages (or em), they
will be able to resize ... (and even with px, users of all modern
browsers can resize - Firefox: press Control-Plus a few times)
> The menu has to be that size, I'm using pixels only for the menu
> because if I let the user change the size it'll screw the layout..
...then the rest of the design is wrong, too. Google for liquid or fluid
design. Zillions of pages, including this very good one:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/webmatters/flexdesign.html
--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|