|
|
Posted by xyZed on 03/19/06 16:34
There is circumstantial evidence that on Sun, 19 Mar 2006 02:06:25
-0500, Gérard Talbot <newsblahgroup@gtalbot.org> wrote
_______________________________________________________
> Any new document should be declared with a strict DTD.
> Unless you really know what you're doing, don't use XHTML 1.0; use HTML
> 4.01 rather.
If I was starting from scratch and I knew what I know now I would
probably have used just HTML, but I really don't have time to go over
all my markup and get rid of all the XHTML stuff. When embarking on
web design I read books which convinced me to use XHTML. Would it be
acceptable to use the Strict XHTML 1.1 DTD?
Is there an accepted problem with XHTML strict, or is it just a
preference by some to stick with HTML.4.1 because they see little
tangible benefit with XHTML?
> Like others, I recommend you use the W3C markup validator and not
> DreamWeaver's "validator".
I've learnt that lesson. It's ridiculous that Dreamweaver 8 can't
perform such a simple task though.
> If you really need to have some links open documents into a new window,
> then, at least, follow usability and accessibility guidelines on this:
>
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/DOM:window.open#Usability_issues
Will do. Thanks for link.
--
Free washing machine help and advice.
www.washerhelp.co.uk
www.xyzed.co.uk/newsgroups/top-posting.html
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|