|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 03/22/06 14:02
Henrik Hansen wrote:
> youcantoo <dwm@findmoore.net> writes:
>
>
>>Henrik Hansen wrote:
>>
>>>Badr.ALmuzini@gmail.com writes:
>>>
>>>
>>>>hi,there
>>>>
>>>>how can i make php file extension hidden in the URL somthing like this
>>>>(http://mail.google.com/mail/?view)
>>>
>>>If you do this the parameter ?view is appended the index.php file in
>>>that dir, so it's quite easy, just make sure your index.php
>>>understands ?view. Another way is to make .html (.htm) files to be
>>>parsed as php, then you have index.html but you can actually use php
>>>in the file.
>>>
>>
>>That is not really a good idea as it puts a hugh load on the
>>server. Now for EVERY .html page apache servers it will have to parse
>>each .html page for php script, even if the page has no php script in
>>it. This really increases the load on the server. It all translates to
>>SLOWER pages. Is that what you really want to achieve?
>
>
> Do you have any banchmarks for your claims? I use this way and can't
> really see any difference at all to be honest. Parsing pages to see if
> there is php in it goes VERY fast. Ofcource everything is relative but
> in general I think it's a good way of masking files.
>
> You could also just turn it on on the php folders if you have seperate
> static content folders, so they dont get treatet as php.
>
You obviously don't have a very heavily loaded server. You get one with
a few thousand hits/minute and it's a definite hit. How much depends on
the size of the HTML files, the percentage of PHP in the files and a
bunch of other things.
Why do you even care about masking the files, anyway?
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|