|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 03/25/06 03:26
With neither quill nor qualm, dorayme quothed:
> In article <MPG.1e8d23234a69c92d98984c@news.isp.com>,
> Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
>
> > With neither quill nor qualm, dorayme quothed:
> >
> > > In article <MPG.1e8c1d2a346bfeef989846@news.isp.com>,
> > > Neredbojias <invalid@neredbojias.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Do you know what "schmuck" really means?
> > > > >
> > > > > No, I have no idea? Do you know what it means to say to someone
> > > > > in a semi-friendly (Australian sort of) way that they are a poor
> > > > > schmuck?
> > > >
> > > > Actually, I've never done that, but I have discovered that semi-friendly
> > > > gestures can often be misinterpreted as semi-inimical.
> > >
> > > er... well, why is this a misinterpretation?
> > >
> > > Look, seriously, I have no particular desire to offend you Boji,
> > > you have never done me any harm, forget about it if you can't
> > > quite understand the rough and bollocking spirit in which it is
> > > said...
> >
> > Seriously, I fence on a higher plain. <big wide grin>
> > (I used to bollock more often but it drained me of vital fluids.)
> >
> > > Shake hands with Blinky, he is my handshaking agent from now on...
> >
> > No thanks, who knows where it's been? ...
>
> Ah Boji, maybe you are not such a shmuck after all!
You may disagree, but in my own opinion (-considering all personal
negatives and positives,) I would have been a good Australian. I damn
near moved there in the '70s (-but the boat sank on its way here.)
--
Neredbojias
Contrary to popular belief, it is believable.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|