|
Posted by Els on 03/26/06 01:35
Chris Ianson wrote:
> "Els" <els.aNOSPAM@tiscali.nl> wrote in message
> news:5nmh82o0db77.13rjnge62f251$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
>> So, let's say someone has scrolled your page all the way till the
>> actual image is in the top left corner of their window, and they press
>> the link that sends them to the right. You're saying you don't want
>> the page to be positioned so that the text above it is visible, but
>> just that it stays put. Correct?
>
> Well it would be nice for them to have the choice of where the page stays,
> that's all.
>
>> Looks like that's what Neredbojias accomplished using JavaScript.
>
> Yes, and the idea is that the page will be positioned correctly with the
> text/map/etc. at the top of the window (using another jump tag when taken to
> that main page in the first place), so when they move within the panorama,
> it will stay in the same place.
[snip]
> Ah I see. The anchor in the main page would have been above the panorama,
> to keep the text/map/etc. in view at the top of the window.
So you're basically contradicting yourself.
a) you want the page to remain in the position it is in when the
visitor presses the link to jump to the right
b) you want the text/map/etc to remain in view at the top of the
window
> You've achieved a similar thing with #4 example.
How did I achieve a + b ? Sorry, I really don't understand what you
mean. FWIW - I'm starting to get curious why any visitor would want to
jump from left to right in a picture that wide, as it means they'll
never see the middle of it. The beauty of a panoramic picture, is that
you can see a very wide scope in one view. If the visitor has to jump
from one end to another, just have 2 separate pictures.
> Is that a layout table or something similar?
Wash your mouth with soap! <g>
There's no table on example #4 (or 3, 2 or 1 for that matter), not a
'layout' one, nor any other type.
> I'm just wondering if there's a way to format it a bit
> and put padding, 3D borders, etc. as with normal tables?
Of course it is. You're seeing a border now, aren't you? Just change
the properties. They won't be table borders though, as I didn't use
tables :P
> If not I think JS may be the way to go.
I wish you luck ;-)
> Thanks again!
You're welcome.
(note to Jonathan: I'm starting to see how you managed to munge the
Gufus thread with this one ;-) )
--
Els http://locusmeus.com/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|