|
Posted by Chris Ianson on 11/23/61 11:43
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
news:4426c116$0$3686$cb0e7fc6@news.centralva.net...
> Now to Chris, it is Chris in this thread, right? ;-) It is admirable in
> computers (in any field as well) to push the envelope. I am an age old
> hacker and love the thrill of discovering innovative solutions that
> break-out of the confines of the "tools at hand". But when there are
> already technologies at hand that can not only do the job easier but
> better, well the appeal is diminished. From what I can gather from this
> muddled exchange is you're trying to create some media effect with a
> dynamic panorama. Not to sound like a broken record but Flash is one
> technologies perfectly suited to this and would do it more reliably and
> better. You could have it the panorama scroll with mere mouse-overs on hot
> zones, God forbid play sounds at certain positions along the way, simulate
> a 360 degree scroll...whatever.
I hear you, but in our market research almost a quarter of people couldn't
run something with flash, or would not bother to install or activate it,
thus instantly losing almost a quarter of our visitors. An interface in an
iframe is, AFAIK, far more compatible. Our site is also targeted at those
who do not often use the computer, so should work 'out of the box' on XP and
Mac. AFAIK, iframes do.
Appreciate your input.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|