|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/01/06 05:09
In article <1143819575@f2.n134.z1.fidonet.org>,
NOSPAM.STOP.gbbsg@shaw.ca (Gufus) wrote:
> Hi dorayme,
>
> Thursday March 23 2006, dorayme writes to Gufus:
>
> > From: doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au
>
> > Well, I think he might have meant the way the diagonal rects
> > overlap the pic to the left (especially on enlarging text).
>
> I still respect your opinion...
Was there a misgiving of any kind to make you say this or use the
word "still"?
> So, I wanted to keep my (back ground) it's like a (water stamp) so I faded it
> right out. It's easer to read *.txt now.
>
> What ya think now?
>
> http://www.gypsy-designs.com/example2.html
> --
> K Klement
> ... Buy a Macintosh? Why? I already have a paperweight.
At this url, the "Gypsy Designs" img did not appear faded on my
browsers (all used on my "paperweight" machines. btw, do you make
your own one-liners?).
Perhaps you could modify the pink colour at the top to be a bit
quieter, you never know how much your visitor drank last night,
quieter is safer... Why not keep to the blue?
Seriously, I don't really understand this design at all? Have you
seen what it does when the browser text is enlarged a bit or a
lot? It looks very messy to my eye. Sorry.
There seems to be no point to all this fancy img replacement
javascript? Your huge rectangles have one function, to make the
word "Visit" appear next to text links? I can tell you for sure
that the more intelligent the viewer, the more this will irritate
them.
Why not forget all this and just use the text, simple css hover
to say make the text change colour or (not really good generally
but simple enough) bigger or bolder.
There, respect that, Gufus!
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|