|
|
Posted by TreatmentPlant on 04/03/06 08:05
Simon wrote:
> "TreatmentPlant" <treatmentplant@DIESPAMMERS.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
> news:442f90dd$0$2111$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
>>499nag wrote:
>>
>>>Can anyone review my website?
>>>The url is http://2search.co.nr
>>>
>>>If interested in link exchange contact me.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>The page took 14 seconds to load in FF on Win XP, 512KB ADSL (52kb actual)
>>in Australia. Too long.
>
>
> As a matter of interest, what would, (should?), be the maximum?
>
> Simon
Someone (?) once published the results of some study that says that
people will lose interest in a web page if they have to wait longer than
7 seconds for the page to load.
Some web designers get around this by having a page render in separate
stages so that at least the customer can see something happening, or at
least start reading some information, while the entire page might take
longer to load.
I personally don't like this. I use my dad as my page tester. He is in
the 'bush' on the world's slowest dialup account (lucky to get 19KBps on
most nights). If a page loads in less than 7 seconds on his account
then I am satisfied! (Sans video / audio)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|