|
|
Posted by Bill Hoffman on 10/20/40 11:16
On May 18, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Richard Lynch wrote:
> *YOU* have check their return value to see if it's 'false' or -1 or
> 0 and,
> if so, *YOU* have to call another function to get the error message
> and
> error code.
>
> This is what I am suggesting is missing big-time in your code.
Yes, you made your point in your first reply -- I'm clueless and
don't know the first thing about basic defensive coding. Thanks for
going out of your way -- twice -- to be so helpful.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|