Posted by Tim Martin on 09/30/83 11:44
Gordon Burditt wrote:
>>> Macros are more efficient.
>
> Anyone got actual PROOF that macros are more efficient in an
> interpreted language? Claims that <language construct x> is
> more efficient without specifying the language are almost always
> false.
Do any widely used interpreted languages implement C-style macros? (I'm
aware of Lisp, but Lisp macros are quite different from C macros).
If not, it's even worse than arguing about efficency of macros in an
unspecified language, we're arguing about efficiency of macros in a
*hypothetical* language.
Tim
*** Free account sponsored by SecureIX.com ***
*** Encrypt your Internet usage with a free VPN account from http://www.SecureIX.com ***
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|