Posted by Erland Sommarskog on 04/14/06 00:32

Rico (r c o l l e n s @ h e m m i n g w a y . c o mREMOVE THIS PART IN CAPS)
writes:
> Lyle, this isn't a ground up application, this is converting a clients
> legacy application. The bean counters have better things to do with their
> budget than build a new version of something they are already using.

Nevermind the stored procedures, but not ripping out DAO while you're
at it, seems wrong to me. I don't know much about DAO, but since it is
a deprecated interface, there is risk that you will run into issues in
SQL Server that are not supported when you use DAO. (The most typical
example would be new data types.)




--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/downloads/books.mspx
Books Online for SQL Server 2000 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/previousversions/books.mspx

• Next in forum: Re: fmtonly problem (bug ??)
• Prev in forum: Re: Smalldatetime comparisons with non-clustered index
• Thread view: Re: Retrieving autonum / IDENTIFIER value from SQL table using DAO.

[Reply to this message]