|
Posted by Tony Rogerson on 04/16/06 21:37
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/default.mspx
> You tell that to Microsoft. They don't listen to me. ;-)
Linking to the XP website proves only one thing - you are clutching at
straws, I might as well point to oracle.com.
If there was any technical merit in your argument you would point at an
article that explained the differences between XP Pro and the windows server
family.
The TPC benchmark seems to have fallen on deaf ears - I would prefer a
discussion on that - just how you are going to rebuke that should be very
interesting if not entertaining.
--
Tony Rogerson
SQL Server MVP
http://sqlserverfaq.com - free video tutorials
"DA Morgan" <damorgan@psoug.org> wrote in message
news:1145209558.153613@yasure.drizzle.com...
> Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:
>
>>> No. When and where did I say "Desktop"? You said it I didn't.
>>
>> Actually you did by the very fact you said XP. That's an OS intended for
>> desktop use and as such is tuned very differently than Server 2003.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/default.mspx
> You tell that to Microsoft. They don't listen to me. ;-)
>
>>> But the same test has been run against all 32bit Windows Server
>>> implementations with the same result. Hope that clarifies it.
>>
>> What about 64 bit versions out of curiosity.
>
> Don't have hardware available from which I can perform an
> equals-to-equals evaluation. When I do ... I will.
> --
> Daniel A. Morgan
> http://www.psoug.org
> damorgan@x.washington.edu
> (replace x with u to respond)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|