|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 04/17/06 16:13
"Hywel Jenkins" <hywel.jenkins@gmail.com> skrev i meddelandet
news:l4udnfrxqcK5Hd7ZnZ2dnUVZ8s6dnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...
> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
> > Hello,
> > there are 2 links on the same page which are not working.
>
> Which two links?
>
> What's this for?
>
> <a href="#content"> <img src="../bilder/test.gif" height="1" width="1"
> alt="Per favore, vada direttamente al contenuto principale"></a>
>
> How do people find your 1x1 pixel link? Is this supposed to be the
> point at which your internal link goes? If it is, that should be
> name="content"
> not
> href="#content"
>
> From a quick scan of the [remarkable] source, you've got three internal
> "links", none of which are called "content".
Ok. However,
They were not the ones I meant
(sorry, I neglected to mention them)
The ones I meant concern
"L´ isola Stora Amundön" " L´isola Lilla Amundön"
> > Am I missing an error or are the internal links perhaps too near to the
> > target point?
> >
> >
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php
>
> I see you're still wasting your money on SSL for this. Why do you need
SSL?
For example because
1) I have many password protected pages.
The use of SSL makes it more difficult for a third part to "read" the
passwords when they are used
2) there is a connection between the use of SSL and a public key, as far as
I know...
this allows an identification of the site..
3) customers can send forms and the content of these forms goes to the
server in a crypted form
4) I find confusing the way many sites are built when they contain pages
which are sent over https and others which are sent over http
so that it is more difficult for a third part to read this content while it
is sent to the server. In fact, it does not cost more to me to have all
pages sent over https than have only some of them sent
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
https://www.scaiecat-spa-gigi.com/it/svezia/vaestra-goetaland/goeteborg/amundoen.php
今天二零零六年四月十七日
星期一
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|