|
|
Posted by Good Man on 04/21/06 18:24
"robert" <ab@nospam.com> wrote in news:Vg52g.1$nJ1.0@fe05.lga:
>
> "Rik" <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>| Euhm.... saying HTML is rendered very differently on browsers and
>| then advising javascript? That's even more of a gamble in different
>| browsers.
>
> euhm's aside. the js is most likely going to handle a non-complex
> function like an onclick event. now that's vs. generating an entire
> html based gannt chart with all of it's elements and pieces...while
> maintaining it's visual aspects, then has to still deliver it's
> functionality...and that, probably a js handled onclick event. now,
> would you like to add more sarcasm?
just to add a couple thoughts to the thread (now-now fellas, play nice).
It's true that going with the various working (and in the case of
JpGraph, fabulous) image solutions to my Gantt quest would probably get
things going quickly. However, HTML just gives me much more flexibility
design-wise (CSS styles, for example) and functionality wise (AJAX calls
to fetch more information about a task when moused over, etc).
The poster 'NC' has set me on my way.
Thanks for the thoughts/thread/help.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|