|
|
Posted by Jonathan N. Little on 04/22/06 16:39
Andy Dingley wrote:
<snip>
> The are also things like Albert the Spammer's CSE HTML which are _not_
> validators. These should be avoided, because they're not what you need
> at all.
I would disagree, yes CSE HTML Validator Lite is a linter not a
validator but it can have its uses. I have a tweaked copy and it can be
useful to catch many syntax mistakes. It can be a quick (since it is a
local program) to precheck a page but you should do the final run
through a real validator. The little templates macros are not bad,
certainly better than FP and DW! Lacks syntax highlighting. I don't
really use it but can be a useful tool. I haven't had any spamming from
it but maybe my copy is too old.
--
Take care,
Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|