|
|
Posted by dorayme on 04/25/06 08:45
In article
<doraymeRidThis-F13584.15381125042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> In article <bgrubb-C596CD.23072724042006@news.zianet.com>,
> Bruce Grubb <bgrubb@zianet.com> wrote:
>
> > If you write to the standard then IE should have no problems.
>
> This is, once again, not correct. I do not know that you will
> ever see this after what has been said.
>
> >We are having
> > this same little talk over at alt.html in the "Which browser to write
> > for??" thread.
> >
>
> You seem quite confused. This is alt.html.
No! Now I am confused! I made a mistake. You are posting all over
the show, even to alt.html. Would you please stop confusing me?
Why don't you do a bit of trimming to cater for poor ordinary
folk like me.
My remarks are still true about IE. You are confusing the order
in which a website maker should do things. The discussion at
alt.html is mainly about that. You seem to take the absurd
position that all one needs to worry about is The Standards (W3C
presumably).
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|