|
|
Posted by Bruce Grubb on 04/26/06 05:31
In article <griffin-A211D7.16345022042006@news.chartermi.net>,
Griffin <griffin@invalid.add> wrote:
> In article
> <doraymeRidThis-DA14A7.11160622042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
> > In article
> > <vilain-E00EF8.09435521042006@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> > Michael Vilain <vilain@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > <doraymeRidThis-7B8A17.14442021042006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>,
> > > dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > >
> > snip
> > >
> > > One point, thought. The way IE 5.23 misbehaves on MacOS X is different
> > > from how IE 6 misbehaves on Windows.
> >
> > You are not wrong about this, IE Mac is almost useless for the
> > purpose of ensuring your site is not too bad on IE Win.
> >
> > > So, to really test my sites, I
> > > have to use VPC and XP to see how it displays and code special CSS
> > > sheets for the IE 6 browser.
> >
> > What I do is have an old PC next to my Mac and look at things on
> > it.
>
> You may find this site helpful. All you need do is enter your URL;
> wait a while; check back for all the browser screen shots you requested.
>
> <http://browsershots.org/>
>
> Mission Statement
> The web should look good for all users.
HTML is NOT a page layout format people. The moment you talk about 'looks'
you are trying to force it into that role and give yourself headaches.
'Best viewed in 1024x768' - best example that your web site is designed by
a monkey.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|